The Brooklyn Rail, October, 2005
Swiss Institute
Do You Like Stuff?
Through October 22, 2005
People like stuff. Big-box stores such as Wal-Mart and Costco
offer hundreds of consumer goods in enormous quantities, and
the Internet presents an endless array of news, entertainment,
and communication options. At home, tchotchkes and knickknacks
fill mantles and display cases, and books, records, and movies
stuff shelves. Nerdy collections of stamps, baseball cards,
and coins occupy the minds and time of countless obsessive
individuals. Families amass thousands, if not tens of thousands,
of snapshots and arrange them in photo albums or digitally
on their computers. People like stuff, and lots of it.
Organized by Gabrielle Giattino, associate curator of the
Swiss Institute, Do You Like Stuff? exhibits the work of ten
artists interested in cataloging, understanding, and controlling
the glut of objects, images, and ideas from our contemporary
world. Not every work gives insight into value of collecting
or how maintaining order over masses of “stuff”
can be useful or malevolent. Overall, though, the artists
approach the curatorial theme in useful ways, pointing out
the fanatical desire to collect and categorize and demonstrating
the irrationality of endless supplies and variations.
The Internet has become a collector's paradise, and websites
like Craigslist and eBay allow unprecedented, equalized access
to those wishing to stockpile more stuff or, conversely, to
let their stuff go. Naturally, anything is available on these
electronic jumble sales, and Barb Choit documents scores of
expiring eBay auction lots in her ongoing daily project, “Ebay.com
Photographic Archive Circa 2005 (January 1–September
13).” Here, the artist attempts, absurdly, to catalogue
the range of items for sale—among them a defibrillator,
a forklift, and a book called Cameraman Movie Cinematographers
Handbook in Braille —with low-resolution jpegs and brief
description of the lot, housed in card files on tabletop.
These cards document not just amateur photography, but amateur
product photography: it's fascinating to see how people represent
their stuff and try to pass off their items as valuable or
“vintage” (the most popular term used by sellers).
It's equally interesting how Choit saves these fleeting images
before they disappear from the public sphere entirely.
Graham Parker's “Broadsheet #4,” dated September
13, 2005, looks at the excess of information we encounter
everyday, publishing a chaotic, fragmented mix of texts—mostly
e-mail spam but also sections of government and business documents,
works of fiction, and even the exhibition press release—in
an eight-page, six-column newspaper. Despite the familiar,
factual presentation, Parker's broadsheet does not offer coherent,
orderly communication but rather mirrors our world of unfiltered
textual absorption.
By applying the Situationist concept of the urban dérive,
or “focused drifting,” to the library card catalog,
Beth Howe writes amusing, informative narratives of her research,
flowing from one topic to the next in a logical yet subjective
manner. For example, the writing in one book from her series
of “Library Dérives” wanders from a study
of island dystopias to a book on the legendary island of “Brazil”
to a compendium of ocean maps to a biography of Henry Hudson.
From credit reports to background checks to demographic surveys,
collecting personal data has become common practice. A part-scientific,
part-detective investigation, David Adamo's “Macgregor
Card” documents the artist's shadowing of the friend
of a friend. He fills hanging files with that person's leftover
stuff—used napkins, bits of foil wine-bottle packaging,
and nose hairs—and places a microscope and magnifying
glass on a desk to scrutinize the collection. This work, however,
ends up being an ineffective inquiry into stealth activity
in light of, for example, how the Patriot Act gives our government
unprecedented power to conduct its own intrusive stalking.
In his perplexingly titled “The Peter Jennings Hollywood
Film Series” (2005), a collection of 104 DVDs and a
viewing monitor, Mike Bouchet replaces the images from each
movie with text captured from the close-captioning feature
of the commercial DVD release. ( Austin Powers was playing
during my visit.) Though reading a movie negates visual pleasure,
activates memory, and takes more time to get through—especially
since the scrolling text moved slower than my reading pace—this
collection's structural presentation doesn't quite explicate
what movie collecting and watching is.
Visitors to the exhibition are free to take an object from
Frank Olive's “Useful Things,” a countertop holding
one hundred everyday items, including nail clippers, a sheet
of paper, a box of tissues, and candy. (The gallery assistant
quickly replaces the chosen object by another identical one.)
Compared to the work of Felix Gonzalez-Torres or David Hammons—or
even the men downstairs on sidewalks of Broadway hawking used
tools, shoes, and bootleg DVDs to the well-heeled shoppers
of SoHo—Olive's well-meaning gesture becomes trivial
and inconsequential.
With the exception of Choit, the artists don't approach vernacular
forms of collecting and presenting as described earlier, nor
do they addresses art patronage by individuals, corporations,
or museums—something one might expect from artists who
create ephemeral projects, installations, and readymades.
Nevertheless, the curatorial premise of Do You Like Stuff?
is an important one that certainly deserves consideration
here as well as further exploration, perhaps with more critically
engaging work and with more room—the Swiss Institute's
project space is much too small for the exhibition's expansive
nature. —Christopher Howard
|